Papa's Got a Brand New Camera Bag: the Think Tank Speed Top 15 Review (ish)
Posted by Andrew Bailey in Gear on the Big Photo Hunt community board, .
I have the traditional love/hate/love-to-hate relationship with gear bags. And I’ve had them. A lot of them. Peak Design? Sure. 6L, great strap, looked sharp, stiff as a board, fell over a lot. (sigh) Wandrd? You bet. Okay. I looked great, not taking what I wanted with me, everywhere. It said 6L. It may have been drinking. And so on.
Backpacks? What, am I going on a camping trip? No, thanks. I shoot street, portrait, and vacation—which is really just street with colorful drinks and questionable focus, depending on the hour. I need something small enough not to irritate me and large enough to carry a reasonable kit and support. That’s all.
Is it too much to ask? Seemed so, until this year, hereafter named “The Year of the Dumpy Gray and Black Angel.” Or, if you prefer the succinct: the Think Tank Speed Top 15.
What’s so great about it? First off, it’s easy on my hip. A very comfortable, nearly 6L sling. It opens away (no more reaching over a lid or having to work twisting to the side to get at things I want handy), which I love, and has two fastenings for options: a magnet and a hook clasp. No zipper (don’t miss it), and the magnet is strong enough to pick the thing up by the small top strap without accidentally opening it and spilling crap everywhere, and still, there’s no struggle to open it with one hand. I don’t use the hook, but it’s nice to know it’s there if the magnet ever fails.
The sling strap is padded and comfortable enough, if not on par with Peak (few are, in that area), and adjusts easily. The bag has the traditional adjustable “stick them wherever” dividers (I use one) and a couple of Velcro-sealed compartments in the top for batteries, cards, and wipes. There’s a space for a small laptop in the interior, which I use to carry caps and my Paperwhite e-reader.
Space? It’s respectably deep and wide for a near 6L (I keep saying that—bear with me). I can carry my Peak strap in the bottom, my Zf resting on top and on its side, with any of my primes attached, and have the one compartment to its left filled with a second lens.
It also has two adjustable compartments on the exterior, to either side, for, say, a water bottle and/or even another lens. I recently decided to make a carry day as uncomfortable as I could and packed my squat, heavy Voigtländer 50mm in the extra interior carry, 35mm on the camera, my 50mm in one of the outside pouches and my 26mm in the other. Apart from the weight, it was fine, and I ended up putting the 26mm on top of the 50mm, inside its cloth bag, to add a water bottle to the mix.
What’s not to love? It isn’t waterproof, though it does come with a waterproof cover that will protect everything if you get caught in a shower, and it IS built using an abrasion-resistant Cordura fabric with a DWR (durable water repellent) coating to begin with. Not bad.
I know, you’re asking yourself, “What does he want—to swim with it?” And the answer is: yes, now that you pretend-mention it. I don’t know. Repellant makes me nervous. But then, I don’t carry my Voigtlander into rainstorms, so...meh.
What else don’t I like? I’m not a fan of Velcro, as it adds a little irritation when I need to get to a cloth, battery, or memory card, NOW, but that’s infrequent, and I can live with it. There’s a little padding between you and the bag, on the body side of things (which is nice), but not much protection for your gear otherwise. The soft material that works for comfort comes with that price. Have I had any issues on that front in my year with the bag? Well, no, but still. Okay.
Also, if you’re fashion forward, it’s not much to look at (see: my yearly title), which could be a theft bonus, I suppose. Call that a wash. If I want to be seen, I’ll paint a red dot on it. That should take care of itself. So, not perfect, but like a good partnership, it’s reliable, comfortable, and gives me what I need to do the things that make me happy.
Dimensions: Internal measurements are roughly 11.2” W x 7.9” H x 3.9” D. Not quite a full 6L, more like a 5 and a half L, but it outperforms full 6Ls I’ve had, and space has never been a problem for me. If you want to lug around a camera with a couple of lenses, I think it’s close enough to perfect.
The price? It’s a high-end bag, but not prohibitively expensive. I think you can get one for around $160, which isn’t cheap, but neither is the price of being irked by a bag you don’t like or can’t use without mumbling a lot. Like I think I said before, when I have mine on, I don’t think about it. That’s the highest praise I can give gear.
Oh, and I have not been paid for or given squat for my opinion. I have no connection to the company or bag in question, and there will be no links generating any profit for anyone named me. Because clarity on that point matters, I think.
Feel free to throw stuff and tell me why your bag is king. I’ll listen politely before giving you the old hoo-ha. Manners, you know.
Also, I might add a photo of my packed bag later, just for visual reference.
Replies
Scott Peterson on
Ah, camera bags. Every photographers weakness and we all have a collection in search of the perfect one. Likewise I searched, read reviews, and watched Youtube videos to find a pefect fit for me and I think I finally have come close.
Recenlty I picked up a PolarPro RoadRunner Shoulder Bag 6L and I really like it. I have a pretty minimal kit with my Zf as I only own prime lenses but I wanted a small bag that could hold a camera with three lenses and a few extras. This bag does it and I can even keep the hood on my lenses which is a bonus. It's well build and rigid enough to protect your gear, has as great comfortable shoulder strap, lightweight, good padding and just enough gear compartments. Another must for me was that the should strap needed to connect via swivel connectors, not pernament ones that twist on you and cannot be removed. WIth swivels attachements the strap is pretty much never twisted so it's quick to grab, put on and go without having to adjust its positioning. I also wanted a handle on the top as sometimes you don't want to carry it by the strap. A couple extra pockets on the side would be nice but for $59.99 at B&H I can live with it. This bag pretty much clicked 90% of what I needed and it's been great so far.
Now all that being said, it doesn't mean that I still won't be looking again. :)
Will Pratney on
Sweet. Thanks for the bag review. I too enjoy using a smaller cross body bag. I have a small (4L) Soudelor Cross Body MILC Bag. It's nice looking and super affordable, with plenty of internal padding where needed, and all I need for daily use, that houses my APSC mirrorless with attached grip, attached lens, 1 additional lens, 2 extra batteries, battery charger, compact wall plug adapter, compact dust blower, lens cloth, WhiBal Card, 1xAAA flashlight, detachable eyecup and extra SD cards. Inner Dimensions H - 13 - 14.5 cm (depending on where; highest point in the middle of the back of bag) W - 9 - 11 cm (tight fit w/Smallrig grip & tripod plate attached to X-T50; widest at center) L - 22 cm (width of bag) Front Pocket H - 13 cm L - 16.5 cm
My DREAM bag (on my WISHLIST) for travel that could carry all this plus a 16" laptop and some clothes that meets most airline size equirements for a carry-on is the iconic Langly Alpha Globetrotter XC Camera Backpack: https://www.langly.co/en-nz/products/alpha-globetrotter-xc-camera-backpack?variant=42017717813487
Ralph Berrett on
This is my gear and the hard case I use. I don't like soft cases anymore. Mainly because when I travel to events, my gear is protected (from bloody wrestlers and camera assistants). Also, my Seahorse case has wheels. This makes my life easier as an old man. I use hard cases for sound and the small pieces of camera gear.
Dennis Corrick on
This isn't my bag; it's off of EBay, but I think it's the same model/vintage and color. Sexy as a mud fence, but that's part of its charm. Mine has a single adjustable divider for a second lens. The zipper compartment in the flap holds cleaning supplies and the forward vertical compartment can hold more substantial things like batteries or film (like mine once did). I replaced the strap maybe 30 years in; it hadn't changed in that time. I think the newest version has two straps instead of one, but is otherwise the same. It's not fashion; it's the camera bag equivalent of a 19 oz hammer; it doesn't need to change!
Dennis Corrick on
I feel your pain, brother, but not your enthusiasm for a 6l bag. I worked with professional photographers in 1981, and one told me that Domke was it; the ONLY professional bag out there. And yeah, at the time it probably was. I saw it in combat zones on TV, saw newspaper pros and my pro coworkers using it, and I loved the comfortable canvas vibe-feel (still do). If you're old like me, it's what walking mailmen used back in the day. I still have my blue one from 1982, and have used it as recently as the last 90 days. I have 3 more now, and they have served me well. In fact, if I shot street or portraits, a small Domke bag would likely be my go-to bag, since it's pretty much made for a wide, a normal and a long portrait lens and a few camera accessories. I have tiny, small, medium and large sizes. The strap needs an accessory: the mailman shoulder pad.
But I shoot wildlife, with the required long lenses and sometimes 2nd camera, and I've struggled with finding the "it" bag. I have the big Peak Design 45l, which holds everything I need, if not everything I own. And it sits on the office floor or in the car most of the time because it's just too damned heavy with the gear to make me want to wear it. I'll take it on safari next year, but it will be for air travel and will sit on the floor of the Land Cruiser, not on my back.
I do have a pack that I've used and like on wildlife photoshoots. It's the Hazard4 Photo-Recon bag, which is long and narrow for a long lens (was Nikon 200-500, now Z180-600), a pair of binos in an accessory pouch, maybe an extra lens and minimal accessories. But it's a daypack for a single-purpose trip (I go into the woods predawn and am back by 0830); no room for second camera or more. It's not for travel. It's great for what I use it for, but it's not "THE" bag either.
I'm traveling right now, and just flew a discount airline to get to New England. No willdife pictures on this trip, so I could travel light. I have a small old Tamrac bag which nicely fit a single body with lens, two extra lenses and a cleaning accessories, and I almost brought it. But with no carryon and only one personal item, that meant no laptop, snacks, headphones or anything else. So I put the gear in neoprene sleeves and put it all in my old work Swiss Gear backpack/briefcase along with the travel necessities. It's way more than I need for a few leaf-peeping pictures, and doesn't hold my gear in place at all; it just rattles around in spaces meant for something else. I've just worn my camera on a strap by itself, with a zoom lens.
The Peak Design is carryon sized at best; zipped out it's too large for even that, and I'm never checking my gear. I've traveled with the Domke bags, but it means my travel companion is my pack mule for laptop and other travel gear. Same with the Tamrac. I've watched pro wildlife photographers on YouTube recommend bags, but lots of times they've actually bought it a seat! Yeah; no. A long wildlife lens just eliminates so many of the alternatives.
I certainly don't have any camera bag answers here for traveling wildlife photographers, and I'm not sure there is one. I do recommend Domke for lighter-gear travelers (look at EBay first; lots of old ones out there at good prices). If I weren't on the road, I'd attach pictures of mine.
I do have a few choice words for airlines which I'll spare you.
Andrew Bailey on
@Dennis Corrick My first bag was a holster--I think that's right--just big enough for my DSLR D5100. This is the first near 6L that's worked for me, that I can carry everything I want, accessible in a moment, and without feeling like I'm dragging an anchor around. I don't know the bag you're talking about, but I'm going to look it up. Thanks for responding. I wasn't sure this would land with anyone, but it's been a plague for me and I'm happy to have sorted it out. On the odd chance someone was in the same position, I thought I'd lend a hand (and open the floor to other ideas).
Ralph Berrett on
@Dennis Corrick I was a tamrac bag user and a photo vest user during that period.